Legal Opinion
Royal Indemnity Co. v. Preferred Accident Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 31, 1934PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
The plaintiff seeks to reform a reinsurance agreement and as reformed to enforce its terms against the defendant.
*298Prior to the trial, the parties hereto, for the purpose of avoiding the necessity of proving matters not affecting the merits of the real controversy, entered into a stipulation setting forth the following facts: On or about March 11, 1926, Stewart Franklin Corporation issued 300 five-year six per cent gold notes, each in the amount of $1,000; attached to each note were ten interest coupons providing for semi-annual payments of thirty dollars as interest on the note on February…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Grannis v. . StevensNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Savage Realty Co. v. LustAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Schonberger v. CulbertsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- Hechinger v. UlaciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
- Corn v. BergmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Michigan National Bank-Oakland v. American Centennial InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Sumitomo Marine & Fire Insurance v. Cologne Reinsurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Stephens v. American Home Assurance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Tetelman v. FultonCity of New York Municipal Court · 1938
- Sumitomo Mar. v. COLOGNE CO.New York Court of Appeals · 1990