Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Lennon

California Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1907No. L.A. No. 1951PublishedCited by 17 opinions

APPEALS from an order of the Superior Court of Kern County settling the final accounts and decree of distribution of the estate of a decedent, and from an order refusing to set aside the probate of a will. J. W. Mahon, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. O. V. Eaton, E. T. Maples, and F. D. McClure, for Appellants.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

The will of the deceased having been admitted to probate, appellants, as next of kin, filed a petition asking for the revocation of the probate upon, three grounds: “First, That said alleged last will and testament is invalid and contrary to the laws of the state of California as made and provided by section 1313 of the Civil Code of said state relating to charitable uses; second, that the decedent was unduly influenced in the making of the will; third, that the will was not entirely written, dated and signed by the hand of the testator.” The second and third grounds were not supported by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Holland v. . AlcockNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Carpenter v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Hoeffer v. CloganIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Moran v. MoranSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  5. In re the Construction of the Last Will & Testament of ZimmermanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Lundberg v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Wilson v. First National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  3. In Re the Estate of ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Societe Francaise De Bienfaisance Mutuelle De Los Angeles v. FlintCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Estate of HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API