In Re the Estate of Coleman
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a decree of the Superior Court of Sacramento County distributing the estate of a deceased person. Peter J. Shields, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
The will of Florence A. Coleman contained the following provision:
“I give and bequeath to the city of Sacramento the sum of thirty thousand dollars to be used in erecting a suitable fountain for the benefit of thirsty animals and birds, to be placed in a prominent place, accessible to all. This I give in memory to my beloved husband, W. P. Coleman, deceased.”
At the close of administration, the executors petitioned for distribution, and the court made its decree, distributing the sum of thirty thousand dollars (less a necessary abatement) to the city of Sacramento to be used for the purposes…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Estate of HinckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Estate of SutroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- In Re Estate of LennonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Estate of GayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- In re the Estate of RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
3Cited by32 opinions
- Lundberg v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Estate of HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Shannon v. EnoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Matter of Estate of KirkIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
- Societe Francaise De Bienfaisance Mutuelle De Los Angeles v. FlintCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.