Legal Opinion

Doe v. S.C. State Budget & Control Board

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided December 8, 1997No. 2764PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEARN, Judge:

In this declaratory judgment action, Jane Doe and Mary Roe appeal the special circuit court judge’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Insurance Reserve Fund. Appellants argue the Fund has a duty to defend and indemnify the defendants named in their complaint.1 We affirm.

*217 FACTS

Appellants commenced a federal lawsuit and this declaratory judgment action after Officer Gary Roberson sexually assaulted each of them on separate occasions. In their district court action, they asserted numerous claims, including federal constitutional and state tort claims.

According to Appellants’…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wausau Underwriters Insurance v. HowserSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  2. South Carolina Medical Malpractice Liability Insurance Joint Underwriting Ass'n v. FerrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  3. South Carolina State Budget & Control Board v. PrinceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  4. Hite v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  5. Doe v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Doe v. SC STATE BUDGET AND CONTROL BOARDCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  2. John Doe v. Palmetto Pee Dee Behavioral Health; Universal Health Services, Inc.; and UHS of Delaware, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2026
  3. Lee v. DorseyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2023
  4. Nationwide General Insurance Company v. BelcherDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2024
  5. Williams v. DorseyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API