Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

South Carolina State Budget & Control Board v. Prince

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 8, 1991No. 23382PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harwell, Justice:

This declaratory judgment action was initiated by appellant South Carolina State Budget and Control Board, Division of General Services, Insurance Reserve Fund (Fund), against respondents Atlee Prince (Prince), Tommy Dabbs (Dabbs), and Naomi Sanders (Sanders), all members of Sumter County School Board (School Board), and against Sumter County School District Two (School District). The School District held an insurance policy issued by the Fund which provided coverage to members of the School Board. The Fund sought a declaration of whether coverage existed under the insurance…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Carroway v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  3. Crittenden v. Thompson-Walker Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  4. Gaskins v. Blue Cross-Blue ShieldSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  5. Beam v. State Workmen's Compensation FundSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Fairfield Insurance Co. v. Stephens Martin Paving, LPTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. United States Gypsum Co. v. Admiral InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  3. Isle of Palms Pest Control Co. v. Monticello InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
  4. Owners Insurance v. ClaytonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  5. Harleysville Group Insurance v. Heritage Communities, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2017

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API