Legal Opinion
Langdon v. Google, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided February 20, 2007No. CIV.A. 06-319-JJFPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FARNAN, District Judge.
Presently before the Court are Motions To Dismiss filed by Defendants Google, Inc. (“Google”), Yahoo! Inc. (“Yahoo”), and Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”) (D.I.10, 18, 20, 51, 54, 56), Plaintiffs Motions For Default Entry And Default Judgment As To Time Warner Companies, Inc. (“Time Warner”), AOL LLC (“AOL”), Yahoo (D.I.25), and Microsoft Corporation (D.I.28), and Plaintiffs Motions To Strike Motions To Dismiss (D.I.30, 31, 32). For the reasons set forth below, the Court will deny as moot the Motions For Default Entry And Default Judgment as To Time…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Blum v. YaretskySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Jian Zhang v. Baidu.Com Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- HOLOMAXX TECHNOLOGIES v. Microsoft Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
- E-Ventures Worldwide, LLC v. Google, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2016
- Girafa. Com, Inc. v. Smartdevil Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2010
- Fruchtman v. Town of Dewey BeachDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2014
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.