Legal Opinion
HOLOMAXX TECHNOLOGIES v. Microsoft Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 11, 2011No. Case CV-10-4924-JFPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER 1 GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND IN PART
JEREMY FOGEL, District Judge.
Defendant Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”) moves to dismiss the complaint of Plaintiff Holomaxx Technologies (“Holomaxx”) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The complaint asserts the following claims: (1) violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510, et seq. (“Wiretap Act”); (2) violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2701, et seq. (“Stored Communications Act”); (3) violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1030, et seq. (“Computer Fraud and Abuse Act”); (4) intentional…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Webster Salasker Lucas v. Department of Corrections California Men's Colony-WestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Caraccioli v. Facebook, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Enigma Software Group USA v. Malwarebytes Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Sherman v. Yahoo! Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2014
- Song Fi Inc. v. Google, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Enigma Software Group USA v. Malwarebytes Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.