Legal Opinion
Oakridge Invsestments, Inc. v. Southern Energy Homes, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided May 6, 1986No. 63881PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEANS, Judge.
Plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s order sustaining Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Having reviewed the record and applicable law, we affirm.
Plaintiff Oakridge is a mobile home dealership in Henryetta. In the summer of 1983, Oakridge wanted to expand its sales of double wide homes. It contacted defendant Southern Energy Homes in Alabama and purchased a double wide office to use at its Henryetta lot. Oakridge was given a five percent rebate on the sale, a discount customarily reserved for dealers. Over the next few months, Oakridge ordered two more double wide homes…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Harolds Stores, Inc. v. Dillard Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Champagne Metals v. Ken-Mac Metals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Champagne Metals v. Ken-Mac Metals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Oakridge Invsestments, Inc. v. Southern Energy Homes, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1986
- Star Fuel Marts, LLC v. Sam's East, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.