Legal Opinion

Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. Whitfield

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 12, 1953No. 394PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaRkeh, J.

Actions for a declaratory judgment under the provisions of G.S. 1-253 et seq. will lie only in a case in which there is an actual or real existing controversy between parties having adverse interests in the matter in dispute. Lide v. Mears, 231 N.C. 111, 56 S.E. 2d 404; Etheridge v. Leary, 227 N.C. 636, 43 S.E. 2d 847; Tryon v. Power Co., 222 N.C. 200, 22 S.E. 2d 450. “It does not extend to the submission of a theoretical problem or a 'mere abstraction’ ... It is no part of the function of the courts ... to give advisory opinions or to answer moot questions . . .” Poore v. Poore, 201 N.C.…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Lide v. MearsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Heyer v. BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. Heyer v. . BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  4. Town of Tryon v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. Shelton v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. City of Greensboro v. WallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  2. Entwistle v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. First Union National Bank v. MossCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  4. Gatling v. GatlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Wachovia Bank & Trust Company v. TaliaferroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API