Gatling v. Gatling
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
The appellants have two assignments of error. First: A general assignment of error as to the rendering and signing of the judgment. Second: They specifically assign as error the first sentence of the third conclusion of law in the judgment “that in the event it is necessary to sell real estate to make assets in the settlement of said estate, the 13 lots facing South on East Martin Street, as described in Item 5 of the will and the remainder of the lands belonging to said estate and devised under Item 1 of said will, are specifically devised, subject to the debts, taxes and costs of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Williams v. . RandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Holland v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Ball v. PhelanMississippi Supreme Court · 1908
- House v. HouseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Meeker v. . DraffenNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Olive v. BiggsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Entwistle v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Mansour v. RabilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- WACHOVIA BANK & TRUST COMPANY v. DodsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Wachovia Bank & Trust Company v. TaliaferroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.