Legal Opinion

Goldner v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. System

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided November 24, 1952No. 50 C 1676PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries which plaintiff alleges were incurred as a result of defendant’s negligence. The matter is now before the court on two of plaintiff’s pre-trial motions, each of which requires a determination of the limits within which plaintiff may properly employ certain discovery devices prescribed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.

Plaintiff’s first motion is brought under Rule 34, which provides:

“Upon motion of any party showing good cause therefor and upon notice to all other parties * * * the court in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Alltmont v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  3. De Bruce v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Reeves v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, D. Delaware · 1949
  5. Sagorsky v. MalyonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Company v. Carl Talmadge LanhamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. McCoo v. Denny's Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2000
  3. Rakes v. FulcherSupreme Court of Virginia · 1970
  4. Mitchell v. BassCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
  5. Carman v. FishelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API