Legal Opinion

Miller v. Stevens

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1923No. Docket No. 61PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

This case was commenced in justice’s court and appealed from there by defendant to the *628circuit court of Kent county where on re-trial plaintiff recovered a judgment of $300 for his services in procuring for defendant a purchaser of a business called the Parisian Dye House located on South Division street in the city of Grand Rapids. Upon the trial defendant’s counsel timely moved and requested the court for a directed verdict in his behalf on the ground that the testimony showed plaintiff assumed to act during the transaction in the capacity of a “business chance broker,” which brought him…

2Cited by59 opinions

  1. Henry S. Bloomgarden v. Charles B. CoyerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  2. Rowe v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Dumas v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Raymond R. Wiskotoni v. Michigan National Bank-WestCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  5. Schwartz v. Michigan Sugar Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1981

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API