Legal Opinion

Ault v. Jasko

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1994No. 93-810PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.

This is a case of first impression for this court. We must determine whether the discovery rule applies in Ohio to toll the statute of limitations where a victim of childhood sexual abuse represses memories of that abuse until a later time. For the following reasons, we find that it does apply and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Initially, we must address which statute of limitations applies to appellee’s cause of action against Jasko. Appellee’s complaint alleges that Jasko negligently, recklessly, and/or intentionally caused her serious…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. O'Stricker v. Jim Walter Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Oliver v. Kaiser Community Health FoundationOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Doe v. First United Methodist ChurchOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Osland v. OslandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. HensleyOhio Supreme Court · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. S.V. v. R.V.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Doe v. Archdiocese of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Dalrymple v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Doe v. RoeArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Collins v. SotkaOhio Supreme Court · 1998

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API