Smith v. Smith
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. J. W. McKinley, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion rendered in Department Two.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.
When this case was in Department the judgment and order appealed from were affirmed upon an opin-^ ion prepared by Mr. Commissioner Haynes. After further con-' sideration, we are satisfied with the conclusion there reached, and with the opinion then delivered as to the points therein discussed. But the appeal was inadvertently considered as though the motion for a new trial had been based upon a statement of the case, and certain rulings as to the admissibility of evidence were not considered because not included in the specifications of errors. As a fact, however, the part of the transcript…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Barnes v. BarnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- White v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- People v. Central Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Evans v. EvansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Pico v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- De Burgh v. De BurghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Fries v. Acme White Lead & Color WorksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
- Andrews v. AndrewsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Ungemach v. UngemachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- De Cloedt v. De CloedtIdaho Supreme Court · 1913
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.