Legal Opinion

Mahoney v. Rich

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1965PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

The only issue presented on appeal is whether the trial court’s findings are against the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence; if they are not, the judgment must be affirmed. Estate of Starer (1963), 20 Wis. (2d) 268, 121 N. W. (2d) 872. This case rests ultimately upon the credibility of the witnesses, and since it was tried to the court it is the province of the trial judge to determine the credibility and weight of the evidence. Estate of Brandenburg (1961), 13 Wis. (2d) 217, 225, 108 N. W. (2d) 374; Guardianship of Coolidge (1960), 12 Wis. (2d) 58, 64, 106 N. W. (2d) 282.

In…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nehls v. NehlsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Estate of BrandenburgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Davidson v. HockingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Starer v. Milwaukee General Insurance Agency, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Guardianship of CoolidgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Matter of Estate of DejmalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Pappas v. Jack O. A. Nelsen Agency, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Druml Co. v. Capitol MacHinery Sales & Service Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. State v. McAllisterCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
  5. Berlinski v. TeliskyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API