Berlinski v. Telisky

Appellants have made it exceedingly difficult to review this case on its merits since there is no appendix. Sec. (Rule) 251.34 (5), Stats., requires such an appendix.

In Lindahl v. Lindahl 1 this court said:

“. . . The purpose of this rule is to enable us in the limited time available to give due consideration to all the cases presented to us.”

On page 6 of appellants’ brief they state:

“On appeal this court’s duty is to determine whether the trial court’s findings are so erroneous as to be contrary to the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence. This requires an examination of the…