Druml Co. v. Capitol MacHinery Sales & Service Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.
The main issue is whether the trial court’s finding that the screed was sold as a part of Lot 351 is contrary to the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence. If the finding is not so contrary, this court will not upset it on appeal. Kirchen v. Gottschalk (1965), 26 Wis. (2d) 123, 131 N. W. (2d) 885; Estate of Rich (1965), 26 Wis. (2d) 86, 131 N. W. (2d) 909; Estate of Starer (1963), 20 Wis. (2d) 268, 121 N. W. (2d) 872. Applying the great-weight-and-clear-preponderance test, we stated in State ex rel. Isham v. Mullally (1961), 15 Wis. (2d) 249, 112 N. W. (2d) 701, on page 255:
“Con…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Isham v. MullallyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Kirchen v. GottschalkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Starer v. Milwaukee General Insurance Agency, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Keske v. BoederWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
- Mahoney v. RichWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mitchell v. WESTERN CASAULTY & SURETY CO.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Milbauer v. Transport Employes' Mutual Benefit SocietyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Baldwin v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Crown Zellerbach Corp. v. Department of City DevelopmentWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- WXIX, Inc. v. Scott Heating & Air Conditioning Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.