Legal Opinion

Burnett v. Perry Manufacturing, Inc.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided September 30, 1993No. Civ. A. No. 92-4187-SPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SAFFELS, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 8). Defendant argues that the applicable statute of limitations bars plaintiffs claims.

For the reasons set forth below in this order, the defendant’s summary judgment motion is denied.

Summary Judgment Standard

A court shall render summary judgment upon a showing that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the movant is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). The rule provides that “the mere existence of some alleged factual dispute…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Theola A. Jarrett v. Us Sprint Communications CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  2. Boarhead Farm Agreement Group v. Advanced Environmental Technology Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Dipoma v. McPhieUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Jenkins v. City of TopekaDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1997
  5. Taylor v. CaseyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API