Legal Opinion
People v. Barboza
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided March 14, 2018No. A150888PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDondero, J.
*1317INTRODUCTION
Defendant Barboza argues his robbery conviction should be reversed and remanded to juvenile court pursuant to Proposition 57, which abolished the direct filing of criminal charges against juveniles in adult criminal court. Our Supreme Court's recent decision in People v. Superior Court (Lara) (2018) 4 Cal.5th 299, 228 Cal.Rptr.3d 394, 410 P.3d 22 ( Lara ) vindicates defendant's position that Proposition 57 is retroactive. However, defendant does not benefit from Lara because the judgment in his case is final.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
On November 29, 2011, the San Francisco District…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. FrancisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. Superior Court of Riverside Cnty.California Supreme Court · 2018
- People v. KaramanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- People v. Hargis, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- People v. Grzymski, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- In re David C.California Court of Appeal · 2020
- People v. Burgos CA3California Court of Appeal · 2021
- People v. Crawford CA3California Court of Appeal · 2020
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.