Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Grzymski

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided October 30, 2018No. A153015PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHumes, P.J.

*802In 2013, defendant Thomas Grzymski pleaded guilty to possession of heroin for sale and admitted to two sentencing enhancements under Health and Safety Code 1 section 11370.2 based on previous convictions for drug-related crimes. The trial court imposed a "split sentence" of 10 years, under which part of the total term would be served in county jail and the remainder would be served on mandatory supervision. (See Pen. Code, § 1170, subd. (h)(5).)

Over the next four years, Grzymski repeatedly violated the terms of his mandatory supervision. In a second prosecution in 2015, he admitted to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  3. People v. KaramanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. People v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. Chamizo, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. People v. Castorena CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2021
  3. People v. ChamizoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
  4. People v. Gezzer CA5California Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. People v. Gezzer CA5California Court of Appeal · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API