State v. Clark
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
LANSING, Judge.
In this case we are asked to reverse a district court’s order affirming a magistrate’s denial of the motions of defendants Heather Clark and Kimberly Schierman to suppress evidence of controlled substances and drug paraphernalia which they contend were found through an illegal search. The magistrate determined that no illegal search occurred. The magistrate’s order denying suppression was affirmed by the district court. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
The facts in this case were presented at the hearing on the defendants’ suppression motions through the testimony of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- State v. DonatoIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. FisherSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- State v. AbeytaIdaho Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. ChristensenIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. CardenasWashington Supreme Court · 2002
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.