Legal Opinion

State v. Christensen

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1998No. 23274PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TROUT, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from the district court’s decision to deny a motion to suppress evidence. The evidence was seized by virtue of a search warrant obtained using information gathered during a warrantless entry by police into the curtilage of the defendant’s home.

I

BACKGROUND

On September 25, 1995, Detective Patrick Kelley of the Quad Cities Drug Task Force received a tip that someone was growing marijuana in a large greenhouse near milepost 350 in Latah County. The next day, Kelley contacted Detective Val Barber of the Moscow Police Department. Barber told Kelley that the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. State v. ThompsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. NewmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. WeberIdaho Supreme Court · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State v. FerreiraIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. State v. DonatoIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Robinson v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2007
  4. State v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. MorrisIdaho Court of Appeals · 1998

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API