Legal Opinion
Chisholm-Ryder Co., Inc. v. Lewis Mfg. Co., Inc.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 18, 1975No. Civ. A. 47-69 ERIEPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WEBER, District Judge.
This is a suit for infringement of patent. Jurisdiction is based on 28 U.S. C. § 1338(b). Venue is properly laid in this court.
Defendants have admitted that each of the claims in the patent in suit reads on their grape harvesters and hence are infringed if the patent is valid. The defendants defend on the grounds that the claimed invention is obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103 and was anticipated by being described in a printed publication more than one year prior to the date of application for patent in the United States under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b). The defendant also…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Anderson's-Black Rock, Inc. v. Pavement Salvage Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Max Daetwyler Corp. v. Input Graphics, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
- Span-Deck, Inc., a Tennessee Corporation v. Fab-Con, Incorporated, a Minnesota Corporation and Rauenhorst Corporation, Aminnesota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Amgen, Inc. v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
- Lewis Manufacturing Co. v. Chisholm-Ryder Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
- Black & Decker Manufacturing Co. v. Disston, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.