Legal Opinion

Hood v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 10, 1994No. 96, September Term, 1992PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McAuliffe, Judge.

This case involves a claim of error arising from a mid-trial substitution of the presiding judge over the objection of the defendant.

I

Samuel Hood was indicted in Baltimore City for first degree murder, use of a handgun in the commission of a felony, carrying a handgun, and related offenses. On 4 January 1991, trial by jury commenced before Judge John N. Prevas. The trial resumed on 7.January 1991 and continued through 8 January, when Judge Prevas fell ill and was replaced during the noon recess by Judge Edward J. Angeletti. Judge Angeletti presided over the balance of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  3. People v. EspinozaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Von Lusch v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  5. United States v. Frederick Newell Boswell, David Rule Nichols and Emmett Howard HerndonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. CowanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. McIntyre v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  3. Stokes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  4. State v. JohnsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  5. Schaller v. Castle Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API