Legal Opinion

People v. Espinoza

California Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1992No. S004728. Crim. 25802PublishedCited by 136 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KENNARD, J.

This is an automatic appeal from a judgment of death. (Pen. Code, § 1239, subd. (b); unless otherwise indicated all further statutory references are to the Penal Code.)

A jury convicted defendant Antonio Espinoza of these offenses: the first degree murders of Rayna R. and Nancy R. (§ 187); two counts (one as to each victim) of lewd and lascivious conduct by force with a child under the age of fourteen (§ 288, subd. (b)); and, with respect to Nancy R., one count of forcible rape (§261, subd. (a)(2)) and one count of unlawful sexual intercourse (§ 261.5). The jury found to be…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by136 opinions

  1. People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. People v. OsbandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. People v. MauryCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. People v. CunninghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. People v. HoltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997

131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API