Stokes v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
RAKER, Judge.
This criminal case presents issues relating to a defendant’s right to a trial by a jury of twelve jurors and the treatment of alternate jurors in a case in which the defendant has entered a plea of not criminally responsible and requests a bifurcated trial. In the guilt/innocence stage of the trial, the Circuit Court for Baltimore City retained the four alternate jurors and permitted them to participate in the juror deliberations. Appellant’s argument is that the trial court committed revers ible error by permitting sixteen jurors to enter the jury room and deliberate on the…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Ballew v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Virginia Erection Corporation and John P. ShieldsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
- State v. BindykeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Nicolas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- McNeal v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- Newton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
- Flores v. BellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Atkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.