United States v. Frank William Ruckman
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MCWILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir.R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Frank William Ruckman was convicted August 7, 1985, by a jury for the unlawful possession of destructive devices within the meaning of 26 U.S.C. § 5845(f)(3), namely, the possession of 13 anti-personnel booby traps which were not registered to Ruck-man in the National…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States v. City & County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- State v. MooneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- United States v. Kenneth D. GoochCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Pottinger v. City of MiamiDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1992
- United States v. CurlinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Laney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.