Legal Opinion

United States v. Frank William Ruckman

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 18, 1986No. 85-2731PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MCWILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir.R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Frank William Ruckman was convicted August 7, 1985, by a jury for the unlawful possession of destructive devices within the meaning of 26 U.S.C. § 5845(f)(3), namely, the possession of 13 anti-personnel booby traps which were not registered to Ruck-man in the National…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. United States v. City & County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. State v. MooneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. United States v. Kenneth D. GoochCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  3. Pottinger v. City of MiamiDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1992
  4. United States v. CurlinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  5. Laney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API