Legal Opinion

State v. Mooney

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 19, 1991No. 13737PublishedCited by 140 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.

The dispositive issue of this appeal is whether, under the fourth amendment to the United States constitution, the defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in certain closed containers located in the area under a highway bridge abutment where he was living. The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, after a jury trial, of felony mur*87der in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54c,2 and robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-134 (a) (l).3 He claims that the trial court improperly: (1) denied his motion to suppress certain evidence gathered as a…

2Cases cited76 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by140 opinions

  1. State v. GeislerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. State v. OquendoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  3. State v. SivriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  4. Phillips v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  5. State v. FigueroaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995

135 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API