Legal Opinion
Mattson v. Rochester Silo, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 13, 1987No. C6-86-792PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
Respondents Rickey and Pamela Mattson brought this action, seeking to recover for damage to their farming operation resulting from the purchase of a silo from appellant Rochester Silo (Rochester). The jury returned a special verdict in favor of the Mattsons on breach of warranty and negligence claims. Rochester moved for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, but the trial court found that notice of the motion had not been served within the statutory time limit and therefore the motion could not be heard. On appeal, Rochester argues that the trial court erred in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gruenhagen v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Peterson v. Bendix Home Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Cobb v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Nelson v. Wilkins Dodge, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Frederick A. Simeone v. First Bank Natl.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- State v. HuggerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Western Surety & Casualty Co. v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Simeone v. First Bank National AssociationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Plocher v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.