Legal Opinion

Newsome v. Braswell

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 15, 1979No. 980PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HESTER, Judge:

Appeal is taken from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County refusing to either open or strike a default judgment entered against appellant. We agree with appellant that the procedure used in taking the default was not authorized by rules of court, and will therefore reverse.

Appellee Dorothy Newsome filed a complaint in trespass on March 14, 1977 against appellant Braswell, t/d/b/a Neil’s Exxon Station and against Exxon Company, U.S.A. The complaint alleged that appellant Braswell had installed a new water hose, manufactured by Exxon, in appellee’s…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Malakoff v. Zambar, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Haverford Township School District v. HerzogSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Advance Building Services Co. v. F & M Schaefer Brewing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Thompson v. CorteseCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Fleck v. McHughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re Administrative Order No. 1-Md-2003Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Gonzales v. Procaccio Bros. Trucking Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Troutman v. Court of Common Pleas of Berks CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Gotwalt v. DellingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Commonwealth v. Abdul-SalaamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API