Legal Opinion

Malakoff v. Zambar, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 20, 1972No. Appeal, 403PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Jones,

Appellee, a real estate broker, negotiated a twenty-five year lease on June 16, 1959, between Easton Road Development Company, Inc. (lessor), and Consolidated Sun Ray, Inc., and Blauners, Inc. (lessees), which established appellee’s right to a three percent brokerage commission from the lessor based on monthly rental payments. Paragraph 21 of the lease specifically provided, inter alia: “This lease is subordinate to any mortgage now or hereafter created by the Landlord upon the leased premises and parking improvements provided that the mortgage instrument…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Corace v. BALINT (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Linett v. LinettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  3. Cameron v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Kros v. Bacall Textile Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Solis-Cohen v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Interiors v. Wall of Fame Management Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Parliament Industries, Inc. v. William H. Vaughan & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Advance Building Services Co. v. F & M Schaefer Brewing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Davis v. Woxall Hotel, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Fleck v. McHughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API