Freecycle Network, Inc. v. Oey
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HAWKINS, Circuit Judge:
Tim Oey (“Oey”) appeals a preliminary injunction preventing Mm “from maMng any comments that could be construed as to disparage upon [The Freecycle Network]^ possible trademark and logo” and requiring that he “remove all postings from the [IJnternet and any other public forums that he has previously made that disparage [The Freecycle Network’s possible trademark and logo.” 1 The Freecycle Network, Inc. v. Oey, No. CV 06-173, Order at 5 (May 11, 2006) (emphasis added). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and, for the following reasons, vacate the injunction and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Amf Incorporated, a Corporation v. Sleekcraft Boats, a Sole Proprietorship, and Bruce E. Nescher, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Coastal Abstract Service, Inc. v. First American Title Insurance Company, John M. HollenbeckCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Big O Tire Dealers, Inc., a Colorado Corporation v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
- Mattel, Inc. v. MCA Records, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by105 opinions
- Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. Mucos Pharma GmbH & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Eduardo Guzman v. Sandra ShewryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Adobe System Inc. v. Blue Source Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. WinterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Luxul Technology Inc. v. Nectarlux, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.