Clark v. Emerson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.
The evidence, when viewed in the most favorable aspect for plaintiff, would permit the jury to find these facts: Main Street in Mount Airy lies in a north-south direction. It is intersected by Wilson Street. The intersection does not form a continuous line. The intersection of West Wilson and Main is north of the intersection of East Wilson and Main Streets. Haymore’s Service Station is located at the intersection of Main and East Wilson Streets and on the south side of Wilson Street. Plaintiff’s car was parked about 8:15 p.m. on the west side of Main Street, 80 to 100 feet south of the point…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Tarrant Ex Rel. Tarrant v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Thomas v. Motor LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Riggs v. Akers Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Garner v. PittmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Hawes v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Jewell v. PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Watters Ex Rel. Watters v. ParrishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- White v. MoteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Midgett v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Rouse v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.