Legal Opinion

Potasz v. Potasz

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 13, 1945No. Civ. 14727PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From a judgment in favor of defendant after trial before the court without a jury in a proceeding to have defendant declared the father of plaintiff, Thomas Ahlborn Potasz, plaintiff appeals.

The evidence being viewed in the light most favorable to defendant (respondent), and pursuant to the rules set forth in Estate of Isenberg, 63 Cal.App.2d 214, 216 et seq. [146 P.2d 424], the material facts are these:

On September 8th and 9th, 1941, defendant had sexual relations with Mable Ahlborn, mother of the plaintiff. On both occasions defendant used contraceptives. At the time defendant was impotent.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. IsenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  2. Arais v. KalensnikoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Joseph v. VogtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Van Der Veer v. WinegardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Jacobs v. Norwich Union Fire Insurance Society Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pyeatte v. PyeatteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  2. Government of the Virgin Islands ex rel. Hyman v. PrinceMunicipal Court of The Virgin Islands · 1971
  3. Veyna v. VeynaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API