Legal Opinion
Joseph v. Vogt
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 13, 1939No. Civ. 12224PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MoCOMB, J. —
Prom a judgment in favor of defendant after trial before a jury in an action to recover damages for the wrongful death of plaintiff’s minor son plaintiff appeals. There is also a purported appeal from an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Viewing the evidence most favorable to defendants (respondents), the essential facts are:
December 28, 1937, at 5:33 P. M. defendant John Richard Vogt was driving his automobile in a northerly direction on Market Street in the city of Inglewood near where it intersects with La Brea Avenue. At the intersection he turned west on La Brea Avenue,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
- Kellett v. MarvelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Figari v. OlceseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Putnam v. Pickwick Stages, Northern Division, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- Fouch v. WernerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Daniels v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Woodbine v. Van HornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Cloud v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946
- Grimes v. NicholsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Frymire v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.