Legal Opinion
Van Der Veer v. Winegard
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 18, 1940No. Civ. 12694PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
From a judgment in favor of plaintiff after trial before the court without a jury in an action to set aside an alleged fraudulent transfer of real property, defendants appeal.
Viewing the evidence most favorable to respondent, the essential facts are:
June 24, 1937, defendants O. J. and Dollie Winegard conveyed to their daughter and eodefendant Ruth W. Pleaney the westerly 75 feet of lot 4, tract No. 3747 in the County of Los Angeles, as per map recorded in book 40, page 95 of maps in the office of the County Recorder of said county. At the time of the conveyance plaintiff was an existing…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Monnette v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
- First National Bank v. ShipleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Fintel v. EngelbrechtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
3Cited by7 opinions
- Shapiro v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- People v. WoodsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Simmons v. DryerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Shiya v. RevieaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Carpenter v. GibsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.