Legal Opinion

Sprint Communications Co. v. Crow Creek Sioux Tribal Court

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided August 7, 2015No. 4:10-CV-04110-KESPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KAREN E. SCHREIER, District Judge.

Pending are cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff, Sprint Communications Company, L.P., seeks summary judgment on Counts I and IV of defendant Native American Telecom, LLC’s (NAT) amended counterclaim. NAT seeks summary judgment on all of Sprint’s claims, as well as summary judgment on Counts I and IV of its amended counterclaim. For the following reasons, the court grants in part and denies in part Sprint’s motion and ■ grants in part and denies in part NAT’s motion.

*908BACKGROUND

The pertinent, undisputed facts are as follows:1

Sprint' provides nationwide…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. California State Teachers' Retirement System v. AlvarezSupreme Court of Delaware · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API