Sprint Communications Co. v. Crow Creek Sioux Tribal Court
District Court, D. South Dakota
1Opinion of the Court
KAREN E. SCHREIER, District Judge.
Pending are cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff, Sprint Communications Company, L.P., seeks summary judgment on Counts I and IV of defendant Native American Telecom, LLC’s (NAT) amended counterclaim. NAT seeks summary judgment on all of Sprint’s claims, as well as summary judgment on Counts I and IV of its amended counterclaim. For the following reasons, the court grants in part and denies in part Sprint’s motion and ■ grants in part and denies in part NAT’s motion.
*908BACKGROUND
The pertinent, undisputed facts are as follows:1
Sprint' provides nationwide…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- California State Teachers' Retirement System v. AlvarezSupreme Court of Delaware · 2018