Legal Opinion

Hart v. Comerica Bank

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided February 24, 1997No. 2:95-cv-76089PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING SOME CLAIMS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION, DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND DISMISSING REMAINING MOTIONS AS MOOT

ROSEN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

This matter is before the Court on various pending Motions filed by several of the parties in this multi-party, multi-claim lawsuit. Plaintiffs Clyde W. Hart and Jane Hart Con-serva (“Cammie Conserva”) commenced this action on December 18, 1995, as amended by their December 22, 1995 Amended Complaint.

A. Plaintiffs’ Claims.

In the Amended Complaint, Plaintiffs allege the…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Melissa Stender v. Anthony Zane BlessumSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  2. Mainor v. NaultNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  3. United States v. County of MuskegonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  4. Boelter v. Hearst Communications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  5. Kawecki Ex Rel. Marlowe v. County of MacOmbDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API