Mainor v. Nault
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Appellants and cross-respondents W. Randall Mainor and Richard A. Harris, individually, as professional corporations and as a partnership, appeal from the district court’s entry of final judgment pursuant to a jury verdict against Mainor and Harris. Respondents and cross-appellants Philip Nault and Wendy Nault, as co-guardians of the person and estate of Jason Nault, cross- appeal from a district court order offsetting the final judgment by $400,000 from a prior settlement with another attorney involved in the underlying case. We conclude that insufficient evidence supports the jury’s…
3Cases cited69 opinions
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Ward v. Village of MonroevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Marshall v. Jerrico, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Harold M. Reynolds v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Hizey v. CarpenterWashington Supreme Court · 1992
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by39 opinions
- Sanchez Ex Rel. Sanchez v. Wal-MartNevada Supreme Court · 2009
- Martinez v. MaruszczakNevada Supreme Court · 2007
- Wyeth v. RowattNevada Supreme Court · 2010
- Stalk v. MushkinNevada Supreme Court · 2009
- In Re Amerco Derivative LitigationNevada Supreme Court · 2011
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.