Legal Opinion

Mainor v. Nault

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 2004No. 39561PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellants and cross-respondents W. Randall Mainor and Richard A. Harris, individually, as professional corporations and as a partnership, appeal from the district court’s entry of final judgment pursuant to a jury verdict against Mainor and Harris. Respondents and cross-appellants Philip Nault and Wendy Nault, as co-guardians of the person and estate of Jason Nault, cross- appeal from a district court order offsetting the final judgment by $400,000 from a prior settlement with another attorney involved in the underlying case. We conclude that insufficient evidence supports the jury’s…

3Cases cited69 opinions

  1. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Ward v. Village of MonroevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Marshall v. Jerrico, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Harold M. Reynolds v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  5. Hizey v. CarpenterWashington Supreme Court · 1992

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by39 opinions

  1. Sanchez Ex Rel. Sanchez v. Wal-MartNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Martinez v. MaruszczakNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Wyeth v. RowattNevada Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Stalk v. MushkinNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  5. In Re Amerco Derivative LitigationNevada Supreme Court · 2011

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API