Legal Opinion

Williams v. State, Department of Revenue

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1995No. S-5722PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Mary Ann (Andrade) Williams, whose claim for stress-related mental injuries was denied by the Alaska Workers’ Compensation Board (Board), argues that AS 23.30.120(c) and AS 23.30.265(17) are uncon stitutional. The superior court rejected that argument. We treat Williams’ appeal as a petition for review and affirm. 1

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Williams, who had held other state jobs since 1974, began working for the State of Alaska, Child Support Enforcement Division (CSED) in 1977. She was a clerk for CSED until 1979, when she was promoted to Child Support…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Vance v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Evans Ex Rel. Kutch v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Wilkerson v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  3. C.J. v. State, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Schiel v. Union Oil Co. of CaliforniaAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Lazy Mountain Land Club v. Matanuska-Susitna Borough Board of Adjustment & AppealsAlaska Supreme Court · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API