Legal Opinion

C.J. v. State, Department of Corrections

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 2006No. S-11298, S-11300PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The rape victim of a parolee sued the State for negligent parole supervision. The State sought summary judgment on the grounds that (1) it owes no duty of care in supervising parolees; (2) it is immune from suit; and (3) it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of causation. We conclude that the State owes a duty of care to a parolee’s victim, but vacate the denial of summary judgment and remand to the superior court to address the questions of discretionary function immunity and causation in light of the principles set forth in State of…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Fein v. Permanente Medical GroupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Evans Ex Rel. Kutch v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2002

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. L.D.G., Inc. v. BrownAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State, Department of Corrections v. CowlesAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Titus v. State, Dept. of Administration, Division of Motor VehiclesAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Glover v. State, Department of Transportation, Marine Highway SystemAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Schiel v. Union Oil Co. of CaliforniaAlaska Supreme Court · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API