Gross v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SWEENEY, Judge.
Plaintiff, an employee of the United States Census Bureau (“Census Bureau”), contends that he is entitled to Sunday premium pay under 5 U.S.C. § 5546(a). He brought this suit on behalf of himself and those similarly situated, and now moves for class certification. For the reasons set forth below, the court denies plaintiffs motion.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff began his employment with the Census Bureau in October 1990. Since that time, he has worked as a permanent, part-time field representative in the Census Bureau’s New York region.1 As a field representative,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Jones v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Bell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Gross v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Jones v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- BAUER v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.