Legal Opinion

Gross v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 21, 2012No. 11-715CPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SWEENEY, Judge.

Plaintiff, an employee of the United States Census Bureau (“Census Bureau”), contends that he is entitled to Sunday premium pay under 5 U.S.C. § 5546(a). He brought this suit on behalf of himself and those similarly situated, and now moves for class certification. For the reasons set forth below, the court denies plaintiffs motion.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff began his employment with the Census Bureau in October 1990. Since that time, he has worked as a permanent, part-time field representative in the Census Bureau’s New York region.1 As a field representative,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Jones v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  2. Bell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  3. Gross v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  4. Jones v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  5. BAUER v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API