Legal Opinion

DeBerry v. First Government Mortgage & Investors Corp.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 30, 1999No. 99-SP-411PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FARRELL, Associate Judge:

The present appeal and certified question concern the scope of the provision of the District of Columbia Consumer Protection Procedures Act (“CPPA” or “the Act”) 1 that declares it an “unlawful trade practice” for a person to “make or enforce unconscionable terms or provisions of sales or leases.” D.C.Code § 28-3904(r). Specifically, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has certified to this court the question: “Does D.C.Code § 28-3904(r) apply to real estate mortgage finance transactions?” 2 The question arises in the following…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. United States v. PriceSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Howard v. Riggs National BankDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Schiff v. American Ass'n of Retired PersonsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Michael Jackson v. Culinary School of Washington, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Murray v. Wells Fargo Home MortgageDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Johnson v. LONG BEACH MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2001-4District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  3. Demetra Baylor v. Mitchell Rubenstein & AssociatCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  4. Daniel Logan v. LaSalle Bank National AssociationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Snowder v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API