Legal Opinion
Thorpe v. Seige Logging
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided September 30, 1992No. WCB 89-25141; CA A70723PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
Claimant seeks review of an order of the. Workers’ Compensation Board denying payment for certain medical services. We affirm.
The Board adopted the referee’s findings:
“Claimant sustained a compensable injury to his head, upper torso, neck, and mid-back in 1978. Several years later, in 1982, SAIF formally denied the compensability of claimant’s DMSO treatment. Claimant requested a hearing. In May, 1983, by way of an Opinion and Order, [the referee] set aside SAIF’s denial and ordered it to continue to pay for claimant’s Dimethylsulfoxide (‘DMSO’) treatment ‘in the future.’
“In August, 1989, the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Drews v. EBI CompaniesOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Saif Corp. v. HerronCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Johnson v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. MathewsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- Buddenberg v. Southcoast LumberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
3Cited by2 opinions
- Astleford v. Saif Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Cox v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993