Legal Opinion

Cox v. SAIF Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 14, 1993No. 91-09172; CA A77360Published

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, P. J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board affirming without opinion the referee’s order that claimant’s hypertension, diabetes and hyper-lipidemia are not compensable. We agree with claimant that the Board erred in determining that the conditions are not compensable, and we reverse and remand for reconsideration.

In an unappealed order of March 29, 1989, a referee held that claimant’s hypertension, diabetes and hyper-lipidemia are compensable, because they are materially related to a compensable hand injury. The medical evidence showed that the three conditions were…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. North Clackamas School Dist. v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. North Clackamas School Dist. v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Albany General Hospital v. GasperinoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. Tektronix, Inc. v. NazariCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. Tektronix, Inc. v. NazariCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API