Legal Opinion

Buddenberg v. Southcoast Lumber

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 11, 1992No. 89-19242; CA A68896PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board denying him increased permanent partial disability (PPD) benefits because of aggravation of a compensable injury. The issue is whether the aggravation claim is governed by the “guidelines” 1 in effect at the time of the last arrangement of compensation on May 6,1987, or by the “standards” 2 in effect on September 18,1989, the date of the determination order that rated the extent of disability for the worsened condition. We hold that the Board correctly applied the standards and affirm.

Claimant’s feet were injured on June 6,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Aetna Casualty Co. v. AschbacherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. Matter of Compensation of BarrettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  3. Wardell v. Smurfit NewsprintCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Buddenberg v. Southcoast LumberOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Thorpe v. Seige LoggingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. Johnson v. Heli-Jet Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API