Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Roach v. Hostetter

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 9, 1941No. Civ. 12717PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DRAPEAU, J. pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered by the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, after sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, without leave to amend.

Therefore, we are required to analyze the complaint to ascertain if it does or does not state a cause of action.

The complaint alleges that the plaintiff in 1924 bought certain lots in a recorded tract in the city of Los Angeles from one D.- Herbert Hostetter, and that the defendants are testamentary trustees of said Hostetter. The complaint does not say when the said Hostetter departed this life. Then the complaint…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Smith v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Mott v. ClineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. People v. SchmitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  5. Strong v. HancockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. MacDonald v. PainterTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Associated California Loggers, Inc. v. KinderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Southern California District Council v. Shepherd of Hills Evangelical Lutheran ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. People Ex Rel. Franchise Tax Board v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. People Ex Rel. Franchise Tax Board v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API