Legal Opinion

Hanneman v. Downer

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1994No. 23434PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

FACTS

This action results from a negligently performed survey and subsequent conveyance of the inaccurately described real property. The subject property is part of a tract of land located in the Pinenut Range of Douglas County. Respondent Stoddard Jacob-sen acquired the tract in 1950. In 1965, Jacobsen retained respondent Robert Downer to prepare a survey map and record it in the official records of Douglas County. Downer prepared the survey with the understanding that the tract would be subdivided into several parcels. Prior to commencing the survey, Downer obtained plats, notes, and…

3Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Rozny v. MarnulIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Cook Consultants, Inc. v. Larson, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
  3. Oak Grove Investors v. Bell & Gossett Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Wells, Inc. v. ShoemakeNevada Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Randono v. TurkNevada Supreme Court · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by12 opinions

  1. Davis v. BelingNevada Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Yamaha Motor Co., U.S.A. v. ArnoultNevada Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Stalk v. MushkinNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Mulder v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Goodrich & Pennington Mortgage Fund, Inc. v. J.R. Woolard, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API