Legal Opinion

Coray v. Hom

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1964No. 4659PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Thompson, J.:

This is an action by the sellers of real property (the Corays) to compel the alleged buyers (Horn and others) to specifically perform their contract to purchase, or, in the alternative, to pay damages. The buyers won in the trial court and the sellers appeal.

The case is loaded with procedural blunders. Halfway through the trial the buyers decided to rely upon the statute of frauds as a defense to the sellers’ claim for relief. Their pleadings did not mention the statute. Having failed to plead the statute of frauds as an affirmative defense as required by NRCP…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chisholm v. RedfieldNevada Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co. v. GrimmonNevada Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Clark County School District v. Richardson Construction, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Sahara Gaming Corp. v. Culinary Workers Union Local 226Nevada Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Marschall v. City of CarsonNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  4. McDonald v. D.P. Alexander & Las Vegas Boulevard, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Schwartz v. SchwartzNevada Supreme Court · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API