Legal Opinion

State v. Melos

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 21, 1986No. 13971-1-IPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Scholfield, A.C.J.

—Darrell D. Melos appeals from the trial court's denial of his motion pursuant to CrR 3.1(f) for the expenditure of public funds for an expert psychiatric evaluation prior to sentencing. We affirm.

Facts

Darrell Melos was originally charged with three counts of first degree statutory rape in May 1983. Following trial and a deadlocked jury, he pleaded guilty to the lesser charge of indecent liberties. The State recommended a 10-year deferred sentence on condition that, among other things, Melos "follow all recommendations of the Northwest Treatment Associates evaluation report."

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. State v. MinesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  3. Yantsin v. City of AberdeenWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Herriott v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  5. State v. DickamoreCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. HoffmanWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Gibson v. Department of LicensingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  4. State v. CriderCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  5. State v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API